You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #95: You obviously have no clue how lawsuits work
[View All]
davidgmills
(651 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #93 |
95. You obviously have no clue how lawsuits work |
|
What you just cited is hearsay. I don't have to read it. I know it is hearsay.
Now if Joe Blow expert says the group must be representative and Joe Schmo expert says it doesn't have to be, somebody has got to decide who is right and they don't get to go look up your cites.
Or, if Joe Blow expert says the sample was representative and Joe Schmo expert says it was not, somebody has to decide who is right about that.
All I am saying is that judges and juries are very poor "judges" when it comes to assessing the quality of expert testimony. They might decide which expert is right based on who parts his hair the straightest. Many times the suave expert wins the case and the non-suave expert loses the case even when the non-suave expert is right. Happens every day.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.