You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #197: In chambers means that there was no formal hearing. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Truman01 Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
197. In chambers means that there was no formal hearing.
You can have a Judge here and emergency motion in his office. Some times it is ex parti which means the other side isn't there. This was a request, probably ex parti that didn't have a formal hearing.

None of that is strange. The affidavit, the deposition, the evidence is amateurish and stinks to high heaven. Arnebeck knows better so whatever his reason it isn't mistake or error.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC