You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #128: There isn't anything wrong with the affidavit. No evidence it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #102
128. There isn't anything wrong with the affidavit. No evidence it
was signed in front of the purported notary, that is hogwash. Law provides notary can only sign a document signed in their presence. He is making factual conclusions outside of the record before him. He is the amature. Hopefully the law provides that Arenbeck can Petition the entire court to review the matter. Moyers bogus findings (outside of the record before him) and his failure to recuse himself should be enough to get some action out of the full court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC