Reply #98: He didn't attempt to "preserve the crime scene."

[joeunderdog]

He didn't ask to confirm the accuracy of voting machines that produced multiple voter complaints on public records.

He didn't establish a vigilant presence in the continuation of the vote count. He says nothing while Blackwell makes a sham out of the Democratic process with blatant criminal behavior.

He didn't establish and re-establish his expectations about the process of counting (and Recounting) the votes.

He didn't talk about the vote suppression and the long lines that were factually based.

He hasn't responded to new information about voting problems since his premature concession.


None of the above would've required him to allege fraud, and doing so would've shown his constituents some stones. Sure, someone would have skewered him, but they have every step of the way. But you can't run your public life on avoiding hitting the opposition's most sensitive nerves. He never has--why now? That's all I'm asking (and I don't want to hear that he is still on a covert mission.)