Reply #37: According to the right its

[roenyc]

the most liberal rag out there. but i dont see it that way. in the past they dragged Clinton through the mud and broke the whitewater non-story. but look the other way with this administrations foul ups.

i am so jaded at this point with all press that is mainstream that i dont expect it to be honest or tell me the truth.

i just go to the times for the headlines. scan over it for vote fraud. find nothing of interest that i cant find in any other paper and then go to Maureen dowds editorial. i am never disappointed. its the best thing about the NY Times. oh i only read it on line and i occasional will pick it up on Sunday, like when they had the full color pic of Kerry. of course the next week they did the bush cover. fair and balanced! dont want fox counting how many times you said abu gharib.

What the NY Times needs to do is report the news the way it is. if there is a question regarding the official story of 9/11 and Eliot spitzer has been issued a thing -- it needs to be reported. and not a blurb on page 24. front page with all the questions that the 9/11 commission refused to answer.

that is not conspiracy or tin hat. that is just black and white fact. and should be out there.

same with the vote in Ohio. They will say its a non story because Kerry isn't speaking and there is no way it will change the outcome. and let me tell you i am tired of the double message myself. So maybe thats not their fault. i dont know.

just know that i dont believe anything i read in their paper. i get my news from the web.