Reply #83: Glad you agree...

[Senator]

... sorry it's with yourself again.

I did not say you "did not answer every single particular of {my} objection." I said you responded to none.

I also never "originally claimed" that any "deadlines are...artificial or arbitrary." I simply claimed they could be set aside for cause; which is always true, without exception.**

At least this time you confessed your ignorance. But the bulk of your post remains unresponsive.

The last bit though is just patently false: "nobody can properly claim that in doing so that they would not be acting in a lawless and illegal manner."

I have claimed it. And properly so, as there is no law you can cite that precludes what I have suggested.

_____
www.thedeanpeople.org


**This is because the law does not recognize "deadlines" as such, only competing interests. What you are claiming, in effect, is that there is some legal preference for a speedy result over a correct one. That is simply nonsensical. Wouldn't you agree?

--