|
First, it seems to me that *******'s question was perfectly legit. Second, the tone somehow implies that ******** is a somewhat subintelligent individual (euphemistically put). Perhaps I'm being defensive here, and I'm glad William sent this clarification. Not knowing *******'s identity, I cannot knnow for sure if he/she got offended or not. But others might have had the same "confusion" and identified with *******. Other than that, keep up the good work and always aim for the top, whatever it takes!
|