Reply #29: Good on ya!

[Firespirit]

:yourock:

The few big deviations in 2000 seem at first glance to have no geographical or other kind of pattern, so it's not like some group was underweighted in a particular region. It looks to be statistical noise.

Since you *want* criticism, though, what was the explanation for the 2000 results for Delaware and Alaska? Small sample size?

Now in 2004.... well the picture says it better than I can.

I have suspected widespread rigging for some time now. My state is "red" and was never going for Kerry, but the exit polls were off by over 3 points. Most counties use OPTISCAN, and that's what I voted on. x(