You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #61: Not silly at all [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
davidgmills Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Not silly at all
You want the judges to give you a recount? Give them a good reason. Not just fraud. Give them a reason to believe that the fraud was bad enough to throw the election.

Judges don't want to waste their time on something that is just an educational exercise. In fact, if they are convinced that the fraud can not be shown to have risen to the level that it could have made a difference in the election, you will get the door slammed in your face in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC