You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: you know how terrorist cells function, yes? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. you know how terrorist cells function, yes?
The same principles could be applied to "fixing" the vote, and no more than a handful of people would be in the know about any particular action. A broad spectrum of strategies could be applied, from supression to intimidation to misinformation to bending a punch card here or there to assigning the number and type of machines to particular precincts...

In fact, I can easily envision a way in which the machine counts could be fixed and NO ONE at the county level would even realize it.

The county people submit their true tallies (which had previously been skewed by the pre-election tactics anyway), and by the time they appear on the official SoS website, well, they're a little different. But they're not going to kick about it, since mistakes happen all the time. These mistakes, like the 4K in Gahanna---eh, they happen. We'll catch them eventually, say the county people. There can't be any systematic fraud here, that just doesn't happen here, the convince themselves. I, for one, can't account for 281 votes in Union County. Eh, probably just a clerical error (I was too sick to take part in the recount, BTW). And only a handful would be involved in the actual dirty work.

That's probably why a three percent recount was, while symbolically important, probably not actually important. And just to be sure, there was almost no county that chose to choose the precincts at random.

I believe Blackwell was complicit, and when the recounts threatened to undermine his authoriteye, he put it around that the recount effort was a waste of taxpayers' money, the employees' time, that it was sour grapes, etc., etc., etc. He made it clear that the counties could do whatever they wanted, basically, and he created the air of hostility in which the recount would take place. At that point, the county people didn't have to know there had been any fixing...they just wanted to do anything they could to piss off the Glibs.

Meanwhile, those ballots sat for weeks...

Say, why does Blackwell refuse to testify under oath about the election? Hey, if it works for GWB, why not JKB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC