You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: In the whodunit over who won it, the true villain is slipping away [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. In the whodunit over who won it, the true villain is slipping away
In the whodunit over who won it, the true villain is slipping away
The Case of the Ohio Recount
by Rick Perlstein
December 21st, 2004 12:00 PM

-snip-
If the Democrats had a Karl Rove—a cunning master strategist who
thinks so far in advance that he wins new wars before the other side
even wakes up to discover there's been a fight—setting up an
election reform movement might be the first thing he would do. It
just wouldn't look anything like the reform movement we have—so
uncoordinated, strategically unsound, and prone to going off half-
cocked that it may end up hurting the crucial cause it seeks to help.

-snip-
What's wrong with this picture? These people should be working
together, not fighting each other. None seems to know what a
coordinated, disciplined, long-term progressive strategy on election
infrastructure would look like; certainly, no one seems to be
working toward one.

Which is exactly what Karl Rove would be doing, if he were a
progressive.

-snip-
As a strategy for election reform, a recount can only work if it
produces a convincing record of abuse. That hasn't happened, and so
neither has the necessary work of educating the public. "Nobody can
say that there weren't long lines in Ohio. And nobody can say that
there weren't more machines in the suburbs than there were in the
inner city. There was not equal protection under the law," observes
Frank Watkins, a longtime progressive activist and campaign manager
for Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign. But the recount has
achieved naught in publicizing these problems.

Republicans rely on such failures. If everyone in the country voted
under the same rules of residency and eligibility, their votes
counted the same way, using the same equipment, it would be a lot
harder to hide needles in haystacks. Getting rid of the current
flawed system, ultimately, has to be the long-term strategy—but it
is hard to get good answers from recounters, lawsuit-filers, and
hearing-holders about how that long-term strategy could come
together.

Link:
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0451/perlstein.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC