Reply #12: If you'll notice... I also mentioned

[mikelewis]

"Is this a result of the national exposure he recieved during his election campaign? Is this hush money? Is this simply a normal thing? I have no idea or frame of reference,..."

In my original question, I stated no insinuations, in my response to you, I stated 3 insinuations, 1 positive, 1 negative and 1 nuetral. I also stated that I had no frame of reference, thus my original question. You are making a point to zero in on the negative and also making a point to not answer my question. And that's okay. I guess you simply want to argue with me for asking a question. If I were to ask this question of Bush or Delay, would you jump to the attack in such a manner?

This is my orginal statement, "This is not an attempt to discredit him. I simply find it odd that his funding has risen after the election. The first record starts on 11/22/04."

I do find it odd that his funding has gone up over previous years and was asking for clearification. I made a joke out of it and asked for Keeryfication. There was nothing negative about this, it was stupid but a harmless play on words.

The question I feel I have to ask, are there any questions that are allowed about Sen. Kerry as it relates to the vote fraud issue? If I were to insinuate that he recieved hush money and asked for clearification would that be wrong to ask?

I failed to ask questions and failed to even care about issues until 9/11. After 9/11, I was the biggest Bush supporter you ever met. It wan't until I learned that I was lied to that I began to question everything. Just because Kerry is a Democrat and I allegedly voted for him, does not mean that he is getting a free ride on honesty railroad. What makes me believe the primaries weren't rigged as well? I have no idea. I am not suggesting that they are but I will ask a question about it if I feel it is valid. I feel the question I have asked is valid. You think it's a smear campaign. I take it from your original response that you do not feel that there is a reason to think this funding is suspect. You have stated that this is his job and left it at that. I also realize that this is his job but would like to know how he was so successful at it this year as compared to the years prior to his conceding to a fraudulent election. I thought that someone here might be able to guide me with something a bit more concrete than "It's his job, you idiot" but maybe I expected too much.