Reply #27: I have read and listening to many of Curtis statement

[Doctor O]

and interviews, and the more I listen, the more I question Curtis. He gives no specific information, just generalized terms.
On Levine's show yesterday, he kept up with the generalized terms. I believe that software analysts and architects could debunk him and his claims fairly easily.
He also stated that he had brought this to the attention of many people over the past three and half years, and from his own statements most of those officials he brought this to did not find him credible, except for one FBI agent (who has died since) investigated and found proof. Now that person is no longer around and can not attest to what he found. If Curtis was really had some proof, it seems to me he would have brought it to the attention of a democratic official who would have continued the investigation.
Curtis also made claims that Fenney shared much information with him about other events and happenings within FL that revolved around bidding and contracts. I find it hard to believe that any official would share this much information with a programmer.
Now having said all this, is tampering with machines and software possible? Certainly, but not as simply as Curtis is making it seem. It would involve more than one simple prop gram that he wrote. It would have to be a different program for the different types of voting systems, and would also require different programming for each county and maybe even each precinct due to the fact that the positions on ballots were changed from precinct to precinct.