You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #62: Thank you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
F.Gordon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Thank you
Like I said, I'm not a computer wiz.

So, question #1 is a definite maybe? The second part to this question would involve tabulators directly connected to the main computer (accumulator). Say, 4 tabulators directly connected for recount purposes, etc.? Would this be less of a maybe?

Which goes back to redirecting question #2 at it applies to the new part of question #1, because it sounds like I'm way off on this one. If the tabulators were connected directly to the accumulator it "sounds" like this would fit the NACK error? I ask part two of question #2 because I know that this did happen. The tabulator modem and the accumulator modem connected but the data wasn't sent.

As for question #3 I'm not sure we're on the same page. This isn't an Internet connection. It's modem to modem. I don't know the technical term for this. I can only relate to this from the olden (pre-internet) days when I use to surf Bulletin Boards.

I only reviewed the security measures at the accumulator end. I'm reading this off a Diebold Election Day manual. I guess I need to go back and review what, if any, security measures are put in at the tabulator end.

As to your question..."how does the accumulator check to make sure an incoming phone call really is from a tabulator?", As I understand it, the accumulator needs to "recognize" the tabulator memory card. Also, this would cause a glaring error at the accumulator end when two sets of data are received. No?

I appreciate you taking the time to respond. My problem here is that I'm playing "guess the fraud". One private IP address and a NACK doesn't give me much to go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC