You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #127: MARGIN OF ERROR -- Proposal for New Exit Polls Now [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
davidgmills Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #126
127. MARGIN OF ERROR -- Proposal for New Exit Polls Now
Edited on Mon Dec-13-04 10:54 AM by davidgmills
On Stones-Cry-Out website this weekend Rick made it clear to me that the margin of error for Florida was 1.8% if you don't account for THE DESIGN DEFECT CAUSED BY CLUSTERING.

You apparently agree with him on that point and I presume he would agree with you on the other percentages you calculated.

But he insists that the Florida margin of error with "design defect" for clustering is 3.3% not 1.8% and that Ohio and Pennsylvania were 3.5%. Some states, due to low sampling, had margins of error of 4 or 5%.

So the question, to Rick and others like him (Mystery Pollster, Mytofsky, macdonald -- let's call them the "clusterists") at least, is how many of Bush's states are outside these margins of error not how many are outside a 2.5% margin of error.

My point to him was that if mathemeticians can not agree on what the effect of clustering is and how best to calculate it, let's have another National exit poll done right now (a random one to avoid the problems of clustering) of between 20,000 to 40,000 Americans (whatever number it takes to get a random sample that is highly accurate) done by reputable pollsters like Zogby (Democrat), Gallup (Republican) and Harris (middle of the road, I think). Have each pollster poll about 1/3 of the sample and make the results public immediately for academecians everywhere (even outside the US) to have a fair shot at analysis. There is no rule that says that an exit poll has to be done the day of the election.

Maybe do the same for key swing states, but make sure the sample again includes enough voters to be a highly accurate
exit poll (I would hope down to .05% and preferrably less).

Otherwise, I just think we are going to have mathemeticians arguing with each other about the limitations of clustering and sample size. Let's take those arguments off the table.

If we made a demand to have this done, I am sure we could get the funding from places like MoveOn and insist that the Democratic Party help out. We could insist that the Republican Party help out, as a gesture of good will, though I doubt they would.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC