You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: I agree with you that there does need to be solid proof, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I agree with you that there does need to be solid proof,
but I think the solid proof is simply common sense. The only way this will likely ever end is if voters stop being so partisan and realize that we're all getting screwed by the government. That's why nobody in Congress really gives a crap about this. And why their more concerned with democracy in Ukraine. But that's basically what the two party system is. Instead of the population against the govt., like it should be, they put on a show so we can fight with eachother while they take half our money and waste it and make our lives more difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC