Reply #22: "Investigative reporting"? LOL!

[ParanoidPat]

Speaking of "hacks" I notice that the thread title was about "Olberman's latest blog" and nowhere in it does he even mention Bev. Furthermore no one before you mentioned Bev. YOU show up and attempt to change the subject to Bev Harris and away from the actual thread subject, that being Keith O. slamming your hero's lack of credibility.

Now why would that be? You wouldn't have an agenda of your own that you're pursuing now would ya? :)

With investigative reporting like 'Well yes the check for $29.6 million was fake but it was merely a metaphor for 'follow the money', I think I'll stick with Bev's approach of collecting the actual, "actionable" documentation from the voting machines and tabulators and see what a documented audit can prove in a court of law.

All of the studies, speculation, and anecdotal evidence in the world will only get you hearings in Washington like the one this morning with only a promise of more hearings sometime next year. :(

A fully documented case such as what Bev and BBV.org are putting together is actionable in court immediately.

It seems that some here are trying their damnedest to keep her from getting anywhere in that regard.

If, as you claim, "it's all about Bev" why do you suppose she was still in Florida collecting documents instead of going to Washington to get on TV and promote herself? They were open public hearings and I'm certain she could have spoken on behalf of BBV.