You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Legal Premise for Impounding the Machines [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
JunkYardDogg Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Legal Premise for Impounding the Machines
False Premises Strategy:
Probably not workable as the Consumer of the Product ( the Government) is Not going to complain- 'cause that would be an admission that they either A. Got Screwed or B. Screwed Up or C. Both
RICO Suit: Rico Is ONLY used where there is instances of illegal financial gain - this scenario is not directly related to monetary gain
Below is my justification for impounding the Equipment, based on the fact that the aberrations were man-made- making them Criminal acts
I sent this message to all the Attorneys who have filed Legal Actions on the Election-
I sent Cliff Arnebeck this list about 10 days ago


The following are core fundamentals upon which I think that you can pursue the E-Voting Fraud Issue:
The Direction which we should be pursuing , legal wise, should be as follows:
1. The numerous, documented cases of vote count discrepancies are NOT accidents, but Prima Facie EVIDENCE of FELONY CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES
2. As such, this amounts to PROBABLE CAUSE
3. The E-Voting Machines are Physical Evidence of CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
4. IMPOUND the Electronic Voting Machines in the Precincts in Question
5. ANALYZE (Forensic Investigation) by Neutral Software Experts- the Software Programs
(there are Experts in the E-Voting Software who know what to look for)-there are documented known programming "aids" to manipulate the vote count built into the machines-the Diebold machines have 2 sets of books, for example

6. Get Court Orders to Get the Server History Records on the Access History of the E-Machines-and the Central Tabulators
this is commonly done in White Collar Criminal Cases where internal E-Mails are used as evidence
We know that these machines and the vote counts were manipulated, but we cannot get the evidence until we
can impound the Machines and Central Tabulators and backtrace the servers' histories
The first machines which we can impound and analyze ( plus the servers) where manipulation can be found, can then be used to seize machines all over the country


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC