You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: That's absurd - he is trying to cover up evidence [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's absurd - he is trying to cover up evidence
How could allowing the IPCC access to the crime scene "put further lives at risk"? His first claim, that revealing the police tactics or how they get their information is a problem, is highly contestable (if we, as the members of the public, don't know that a shoot-to-kill policy is in force, then we are at risk ourselves), but there is no way he can extend that to barring the IPCC from examining the crime scene.

In practice, what this means is that the Met got a chance to destroy the station videos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC