Reply #58: Whether she blogs here or not - and the last post was years ago -

[karynnj]

the op outlines things she said that could not have all been true - as they contradict. They are very specific things - like saying her reaction to the 2007 NE - when, in her current story she KNEW of the affair because JRE told her in 2006 - was to give it no credibility does not make sense. She is either lying in her book that JRE told her in 2006 (my bet) or she is lying or completely stupid (which she isn't) in her reaction to the NE article.

Think about it. She knew in 2007 that the NE had its facts right about the woman and published it. This meant the risk of JRE being caught increased GIGANTICALLY. She is lying when she said she dismissed it as not likely.