66. Criticizing the targeting and murder of civilians and non-combatants...
is not defending Milosevik in any way.
Just like criticizing the actions in Iraq is not defending Saddam.
Why are Clark supporters using freeper style arguments to defend the intentional targeting and murder of civilians by Clark in Kosovo?
The argument is not that intervention in Kosovo was wrong... the argument is that Clark's tactics were wrong. So why try and hide behind a straw man of accusing any critic of supporting milosevik, if Clark's murdering of civilians was so honorable?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
