You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: oppose the DLC policies that one strongly disagrees with and are unpopular [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. oppose the DLC policies that one strongly disagrees with and are unpopular
Whether or not the DLC organization plays a role in the Democratic Party is of minimal concern to me. I would however be deeply concerned about reactionary policies regardless what organization supports them.

My biggest concern regarding the DLC is that certain strong elements of the DLC along with some people who are clearly not DLC at all support a foreign policy worldview that is neither centrist or moderate, but extremist - a somewhat modified form of foreign policy neoconservatism. Now this ideology has been completely discredited by facts on the ground and is extraordinarily unpopular. If these ideologues, whether DLC or not, succeed in their agenda - America will find itself in a state of permanent and self-destructive war and there will be no resources left to rebuild the economy and the national infrastructure - much less implement new programs that benefit ordinary people. Fortunately a number of sane and rational people even within the Defense and Intelligence establishment recognize the utter folly of this dangerous and destructive worldview. "A bunch of dangerous Kooks", to quote Gen. Brent Scowcroft, Bush Sr.'s former National Security Adviser - hardly a lefty.

As far as getting rid of ALL beltway corporate lobbyist. I'm afraid that would require a total social revolution. As someone more eloquent and more learned than me once said, "government is the executive committee of the bourgeoisie." I doubt that any of us are up to the task of a social revolution at this point. And there is certainly no mass political will for such an all encompassing adventure.

It might be possible however to push massive draconian legislation that could clip the wings of lobbyist just a bit. For such legislation to pass, it might also impose equally strong controls on progressive lobbyist. Still reducing the relatively weak influence of progressive lobbyist might be a reasonable price to pay in exchange for reducing the very strong influence of corporate lobbyist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC