Reply #8: One reason why I reply to the goody two shoes who villify those

[Malva Zebrina]

who talk in a "disrespectful" way about Saint Laura and this is only one of them. I have collected a lot of them. This is only example of how Laura promotes fascism.
She is a shill for the destruction of this country and I owe her nothing. No respect whatsoever.

<snip>

Generally, I stay away from depositing scorn upon the First Ladies of the land . . . . Until this week, when they rolled her out to talk about stem cells, and she unctuously explained to the country that, maybe, the benefits of stem-cells were being "oversold." I watched her, all creamy certitude, and for the first time since 2000, wondered: "Where in the hell do you get off, lady?"

We all recall that Hitlery tried to sneak the Russian Red Army into the country under the guise of reforming the health-care system, but shouldn't we be a bit alarmed as well that a back-country librarian from Level Crossing, Texas is out there explaining cutting-edge science to the nation? Where in hell is the President's Council On Bioethics? (Probably either bleeding people with leeches or booking tours to Lourdes.) I mean, would I ask Gregor Mendel where the biography section is?

Look, it is entirely possible that stem-cell research will not be the panacea that its proponents say it will be. Sadly, that may well be the case with Alzheimer's, which is my particularly nasty-ass dog in this fight.

But, what eludes Laura, her husband, and whoever reads "My Friend, The Genome" to him is that's what f***king research is FOR! (I'm shouting now.) You do the research to find out IF the little critters will perform as advertised.

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:74IsZZZzwHYJ:simbaud.blogspot.com/2004/08/from-annals-of-wocowot.html+Altercation+Charles+Pierce+Laura+Bush&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&strip=0