Reply #34: OK, first of all

[FatDave]

You know damn well that had your candidate performed well in the caucus states, you wouldn't be saying this crap. It's not like some brand new system was sprang on Hilary. This is how it's worked for decades. Seriously, take a step back and accept that she underperformed in caucuses. If you have to blame the system, a system everybody was familiar with and happy with going in, well, you're just ducking reality.

Not only that, just a couple posts up, you said: "there is no 'win' - only decision points for super delegates to consider" So is that the democratic way? Or is that the undemocratic way. Or is that some, I dunno, third way?

Look, I've got no problem with who you supported in the primaries. That's everybody's choice to make. But you really need to start thinking about letting it go now. Your tortured logic isn't helping, it's only making you look foolish.