You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: Bill Clinton's law? Not quite. Try PHIL GRAMM. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Bill Clinton's law? Not quite. Try PHIL GRAMM.
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act">Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act.

Phil Gramm's bill.

Yet MyLeftWing only mentions Gramm ONCE. And never mentions the name of the bill AT ALL.

It's like writing a history of the 60s and mentioning The Beatles only once.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:SN00900:|
(You may need to correct the URL to use Thomas' register.)

This was a Republican initiative. Clinton signed it when it had passed by a veto-proof majority -- then bragged about how it was HIS bill.

The Republicans went apeshit. Ballistic. Nuclear. They howled. Cursed him. Cursed Hillary, and Chelsea, and Socks the Cat. It was on TV.

So in a way, yes, it was "his bill". Think about how the Obama supporters boil over when Hillary "steals" one of his lines to tweak him. Multiply that by a thousand, and that's what you had. It was on TV.

Most of those bills you like to tie around Clinton's neck are like that -- especially the Welfare bill that everyone brings up. Newt's face was CRIMSON when he was interviewed over that one. You forget how Bill kicked the GOP in the balls, repeatedly. Instead, you believe bourgeois Trotskyite-wannabes who tell you that Clinton was "the best Republican president we've had". And you believe it because it makes you feel clever.

Put that in next to "not a nickel's worth of difference".

So instead of looking into this, you took an angry, gullible blogger's word for it, and she took Robert Kuttner's word for it (though he only gets ONE mention).

Original Source Research by MyLeftWing: NONE.

It's another smear-Clinton screed from -- this one the left instead of the right.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC