Reply #11: Why not read the interview and see what she REALLY says?

[Rageneau]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/washington/15clintontext.html

This article derives from a half-hour interview Hillary gave to the New York (whore) Times back in March (linked above). If you care what she REALLY said in this interview, you can either read it yourself, or you can let the NY(w)T read it to you, editorializing while they do. But keep in mind that the NY(w)T hates the Clintons and has a long record of being unfairly biased against them.

That means the NY(w)T is likely to lie to you about Hillary, to distort what she says, to put her words into the most negative possible light, to snipe at her character and personality within an article that is ostensibly about her policies and opinions.

And, no surprise, that's what the NY(w)T does here.

The actual interview shows Hillary to be astonishingly well-informed on the issue, completely up-to-date with all the complications, and possessed of a well-thought-out, completely rational plan for how to proceed in Iraq if she becomes President.

Before offering an opinion of Hillary's stance on Iraq -- and before repeating the slanders of the MSM -- it would behoove any fair-minded, well-informed American to actually read this interview. See for yourself what she has to say. And see if you disagree.

Whether you do or not, I bet you'll come away from this interview at least reassured that HRC is a smart, serious, dedicated woman who is ready to be president.

No matter WHAT the NY(w)Times thinks.