Reply #17: Clinton Derangement Syndrome strikes DU

[Rageneau]

Anybody who HONESTLY reads and interprets what Clinton said about "supporting" Iraq" knows that he did NOT support Bush's invasion and never, ever, ever, was for it.

What he says he supported was "going back into Iraq with UN inspectors to locate WMD." It was the UN inspections Clinton supported, not Bush's war. He has NEVER gone on record as supporting the invasion itself, although he did say -- back when only 600 American soldiers had died - that he hoped the effort (invasion) turned out to be "worth it."

To intentionally misinterpret what Clinton said in order to make it look like he supported Bush's fiasco is nothing but Clinton Derangement Syndrome (CDS) is action. TIME magazine has always suffered from CDS (so has the WP and NYT) and now it seems to have spread to DU where, once, people tried to be honest and truthful in their comments.

These days, DU sometimes looks more like FR.