Reply #68: The past is prologue

[Martin Eden]

I agree with forgive but not forget. My litmus test of the IWR vote is not a matter of dwelling on the past. It's a matter of evaluating presidential qualifications on the judgement a candidate has shown -- especially on the really crucial issues that separate enlightened leadership from good intentions that can go awry. I don't blame Joe Biden and other Dems who voted for the IWR for the catastrophe in Iraq. I blame Cheney/Bush. But I remember the crucial votes and factor that into my evaluation.

What you and I differ on is the extent to which past mistakes are a predictor of future errors in judgement. The 2002 IWR may be unique in its set of circumstances and the unprecedented criminal deceit by a president, but it still stands as a crucial vote and test of judgement. Perhaps if I myself had erred in trusting Bush I would not have this litmus test. However, as I've already pointed out and as Byrd, Feingold, and Gore articulated so persuasively, the reasons for not giving this president the authority at that time far outweighed any need to grant it. If Joe Biden could not see that, what might be his blindspots as president?

To tell you the truth, I have not completely ruled out casting my vote for Joe. He has been impressive, and is more electable than my favorite, Dennis Kucinich. I also think he is more electable than the top 3 Dem contenders, despite the polls.

There is plenty of time before the Illinois primary, and I will closely examine the candidates on the issues and make an evaluation. But anyone who voted for the IWR has an uphill climb to convince me he or she possesses superior judgement.