Reply #182: And again, you can't refute anything I've said.

[Alexander]

It's funny watching you avoid debate of the two main points I was making, because you know you can't defend what you said.

1. FDR threatened to withdraw in 1940 without Wallace. I challenge you to find me a credible historian who says otherwise, or somehow back up your claim that he did not.

2. Wallace was likely to win renomination in 1944, only to have the anti-Wallace party chairman demand that the convention adjourn due to a bogus "fire hazard", against the wishes of the delegates.

So you cover for your weaknesses by repeating yourself and using lots of :rofl: smilies (because every extra smilie makes you that much more right!)

"No one has denied that. But in doing so, he marginalized "progressives" of the day."

And yet you continue to argue that his policies were somehow not progressive...

They must pay you well.