Obama and HRC have the same position on the war today but Edwards wants to end the war. He will take all the troops out except for the small number needed to protect the embassy, which we have in every country. There are other candidates who favor ending the war as well.
HRC is being as vague as possible on Iraq. "Vast reduced residual force" is a telling example. What exactly does that mean? She also talks about "determining" if there are "vital security interests"--after the blank check for her being in the WHite House for four years is signed. She should tell us before the election what exactly she wants and when she will end the war.
Sure, she does not want anything permanent. How "temporary" is is "temporary", though?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
