Reply #89: I haven't hi-jacked the clark thread.

[noamnety]

I've discussed Clark in the Clark thread.

You've done a poor job of searching my posting history if you think I've singled out Clark for my criticism. Here, let me help:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=112849#113344
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=3092579
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=3037811#3038313
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=3062596#3063477
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=3094713#3094741

You see a pattern here? When elected officials claim they oppose the war, and continue to fund it, or claim they oppose the war but want to leave troops there for some political purpose, or claim they oppose war but think they might use DU or cluster bombs in the future, it pisses me off. I don't care if it's Edwards, Clark, Clinton (Bill or Hillary), Pelosi, Rahm, or God. It pisses me off.

I think the only guy I haven't trashed for war mongering is probably Kucinich - but if you can prove me wrong there, the difference between you and me is I'll read the links with an open mind, and if he's been advocating killing people or using weapons that kill civilians, or bombing tv stations, I'll call him out for it, too.