You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chambliss: better intelligence South would have won US Civil War [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:53 AM
Original message
Chambliss: better intelligence South would have won US Civil War
Advertisements [?]
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/GOP_Senator_says_with_better_intelligence_0918.html

GOP Senator says with better intelligence South would have won US Civil War.

At a closed door meeting of the Armed Services Committee, Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) said with better intelligence the South would have won the Civil War, today's ROLL CALL is reporting.

Conflicting reports of what was said have emerged, one from a source to Roll Call's Heard on the Hill column, the other a spokesperson for Chambliss. “We need better intelligence. If we had better intelligence in the Civil War we’d be quoting Jefferson Davis, not Lincoln,” The source told ROLL CALL


<<<<snip>>>>

Democratic sources expressed outrage that he compared the Civil War to the Bush administration’s war on terror. "It’s a little disgusting" to be equating the two, one Democratic source said, adding, "You can’t figure out whether he didn’t understand the Civil War, or the war on terror, or both."


Yes, And Mr Chambliss, a man so disgustingly putrid that he would slander the honor of a man who actually served in Vietnam, was a decorated war hero and sacrificed two legs and an arm in that war, is such an expert on Wartime Intelligence.

So I'm guessing, how would that 'intelligence' for the South been of use for this country. I'm guessing he thinks that's not such a bad idea.

Of course Mr. Chambliss is denying this - just like he's denying that there was any wrong-doing in his election run against Max Cleland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC