You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: I'm just reporting what I've read on those websites [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. I'm just reporting what I've read on those websites
Edited on Mon Aug-21-06 11:25 PM by Awsi Dooger
I know all about Guiliani's personal baggage, plus the issues that supposedly make him very unlikely to be the nominee. But on those balanced forums the Republican posters favor Guiliani by stunning margin, whether they are moderate or far right.

I don't know how the other side thinks in terms of nominees so I'm merely mentioning it here, what I've read in dozens if not hundreds of posts. McCain is basically shunned and dismissed, just like we think of Lieberman, as someone above posted. They consider Guiliani their best chance to win so they embrace his candidacy regardless of issue differences, and love the supposed tough guy image from 9/11. If it changes on those sites I'll report it here but it's been so dramatic i doubt that will happen.

On edit: I should mention that when I say right wing posters in regard to those balanced sites it's the way I think of them when I'm there. I'll see a user name and if he's a Republican-type I stamp him as a right winger for reference purposes, whether he is moderate or hard right. So when I write "right wingers" here it's merely toting the term from those sites, instead of breaking it down to slightly right leaning or hard right. No matter how far right they are, they seem to prefer Guiliani for their nomination, by significant plurality if not outright majority. Of course, it could be merely the vocal ones, the ones who blog, and not representative of what happens in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC