You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #78: Clinton was a Skull and Bones Bilderberger NOT a Dem and neither is Hilary [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #63
78. Clinton was a Skull and Bones Bilderberger NOT a Dem and neither is Hilary
Look up the Clinton/Bush murders including Mena airbase drug trafficking and Officer Teaky's torture murder for investigating the lies about the Oklahoma bombings, just for starters.

Go to http://www.StopTheLie.com/ about the PNAC and how the left/right paradigm is no longer valid with all the DINOs in Congress and think about it. Labels don't mean anything. Look deeper into Clinton's and Kerry's actions.

A more recent example. I wrote and sent article to Sen. Carl Levin, purported Democrat and Graham telling them I was going to publicize their betrayal of human values every chance I could:

http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/report.asp?ObjID=VJQl1vGD5N&Content=684

==Center for Constitutional Rights Statement on Dangers of Court-Stripping and Graham-Levin Amendment

Most disturbing, Graham-Levin will eliminate the historic right of habeas corpus for anyone held at Guantánamo. Federal courts will be stripped of habeas jurisdiction for the first time in well over a century. By undertaking a major change in the jurisdiction of federal courts, by way of eliminating a right, the origins of which go back to the Magna Carta in 1215, Graham-Levin constitutes a beachhead in what we fear to be a campaign to undermine fundamental rights in the United States and around the world.

The New York Times called the Graham-Levin amendment "a malignant measure" in a critical editorial today, and warned that it "would do grievous harm to the rule that the government cannot just lock you up without showing cause to a court. This fundamental principle of democratic justice must not be watered down so the Bush administration does not have to answer for the illegal detentions of hundreds of men at Guantánamo Bay and other prison camps." The Center for Constitutional Rights stands with all the leading civil and human rights organizations to condemn the Graham-Levin amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC