You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: well some of it is true [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. well some of it is true
In February 1937 FDR tried get legislation introduced in congress that would overhaul the federal judiciary. It was a complex bill, but the ultimate outcome of it, if it was passed, would been to add one justice for every judge over the age of 70. It would of swelled the supreme court to 15 justices, 6 of whom would of been appointed by Roosevelt.

And people have a problem with bush's attempts to undermine the court today by appointing people like Roberts...

Interment camps existed on US soil throughout world war II, holding Japanese Americans almost exclusively. Italian and German POW transported to the USA in some instances had more freedom then American citizens of Japanese Ancestry who were held in the camps.

The Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1933 began a massive federal subsidy and agriculture management program intended to stabilize prices. Because the law became effective after the growing season had already began, large amounts of already growing crops were destroyed to bring the agriculture output in line with what was specified by the act.
So, of the consequences of the program was that excess crops were destroyed rather then released to the open market (a infusion of crops would of disrupted the attempts to artificially manage the price of agriculture).

Roosevelt came into power in 1932, but in 1937 and 1938 the Great Depression was almost as bad as it was in the early 1930's. FDR's opponents point to this fact as proof that the New Deal was less then effective at dealing with the depression as popularly thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC