Reply #90: ...but much more accurate than, say...

[wyldwolf]

...your "FUCK THE TRAITOROUS TREASONOUS DLC" tirades.

I'll freely admit that Bill Clinton was the most successful President in my lifetime, so far.

Damn straight.

Of course when your competion is Nixon, Reagan, the Asshole and the Idiot Son of the Asshole, that's not really saying that much.

Of course, FDR shined because his competition was Hoover, Harding, Coolidge, Truman, and Eisenhower?

I guess you could argue LBJ against him, if not for Vietnam.

A major screw-up!

And I believe Jimmy Carter was a far better moral leader.

But that's about it.

However, that doesn't qualify his wife to be the next President, and that's what a certain segment of the population of this board (largely "centrist" types/DLC sympathizers) and the Whore Media are trying to shove down our throats while the bad taste of the last election theft is still there.

I haven't seen anyone on this board or in the media claim Hillary is qualified to be President based on being the wife of Bill Clinton.

I don't believe any freshman senator is the best candidate.

Nor any Green consumer advocate...

I don't believe marriage equals executive experience,

No one has said it does.

and I don't believe I can trust a candidate who started out her career in politics on the Barry Goldwater campaign, and is now advocating postions which are so far to the neocon right that even Goldwater would be embarrassed.

RFK began his career working for McCarthy. Would you have trusted him?

What positions has Hillary advocated that are so far to the neocon right that even Goldwater would be embarrassed?