You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Sales Tax: "massive redistribution of burden to the middle class" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:43 PM
Original message
National Sales Tax: "massive redistribution of burden to the middle class"
Advertisements [?]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32739-2005Apr6.html

Thursday, April 7, 2005; Page A30

George F. Will blithely commented that the national sales tax proposed by Rep. John Linder (R-Ga.) would "not only sensitize consumers to the cost of government with every purchase, (but) would destroy K Street" (op-ed, March 31). But a 23 percent sales tax would constitute a massive redistribution of the tax burden to the middle class and the poor -- exactly the people into whose hands more money should flow if an economy is to grow from the ground up. A 23 percent tax on food? Want to exempt food? What constitutes "food"? Or "medicine"? Figuring those things out will cost the government plenty. Want to simplify the tax code and kill K Street? Get rid of tax breaks for corporations and rich people, and fix the tax brackets so that fewer people are taxed out of the economy.

George F. Will overstated the simplicity and ease of enforcing a national sales tax. Only "personal" purchases would be subject to the tax; thus, the incentive would be to classify purchases as "business" to avoid the tax. Likewise, not all services would be taxable. Education, for example, would be classified as an "investment" and thus exempt. No doubt those K Street lobbyists would attempt to add other exemptions. Who'd want to pay a sales tax on medical expenditures or a house? And would churches, charities and the government pay this high sales tax on their purchases?

In addition, Mr. Will repeated the misleading assertion that the tax rate is 23 percent. Under this plan, though, the tax on a $100 purchase would be $30. Proponents are using the "tax-inclusive" method to calculate the tax rate, dividing the tax of $30 by the price-plus-tax of $130 to produce a rate of 23 percent. This is not the way sales tax rates are usually calculated. Anyone on the street would tell you that a 23 percent tax on a $100 purchase would be $23. No nation or state has had success in collecting a sales tax at such a high rate; evasion no doubt would be rife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC