Reply #2: If the public OKs

[undergroundpanther]

Shiavos death and lets the congress decide who lives and dies' than all those brain dead veterans,the disabled people's families clamoring for health benefits from the bush cabal's corporate buddies will be starved to death.

If the courts and NOT the family decides Terry's fate,than it's a score for eugenics.
A ghoulish spectacle, yes and it has an even more ghoulish ulterior agenda.What you see here is depending on if you are an elite looking to screw unproductive' people, a religious nut drinking kool aid or a poor or disabled person.

All these views are emotional..

But really Is it the states job to be who decides who lives or dies in America? or not?
In Hitlers germany the government absolved families of guilt and a side effect was that genocide on certain people was ..'normalized'.

And what of the human fallout from all these bad risks the rich take with other's lives and the damage done to bodies and minds by profiteers and manipulators that insurance companies and the gubnint are trying to avoid paying for now?..Who got hurt the most in their rush for profits in schemes? It costs lives of mostly POOR people..and of Soldiers who now need help.Famlies clamoring for money to help the soldiers and kids.lives that these rich fucks don't want to pay for damaging..for people said rich fucks want to use and throw away?

Terry was anorexic, She was a victim of a for profit beauty industry marketing insecurity,A social fat phobia and abuse at home.Anorexia kills alot of women by a cultureal crime of taking away the right to have the body these women have..It's done by industr IMPOSING an unattainable ideal for women to persue,beauty for being worthy of love, they must conform to it or face shame or rejection and ridicule. I dispise this culture and the way it abuses people from cradle to grave for money.

The Abuse people endure in this culture is insidious and deadly sometimes especially when people are IGNORANT.

So,If the state decides and families can't legally decide the fate of their loved ones, and the law is written so state decides these things for them we are fucked...I don't trust the state,to be moral.To care about the issues,of weak , poor or disabled people and their families. I mean shit Bush wants to privatize social security ,put it up for gambling in markets that gave us Enron and a hundred other financial scams.

This time I fear it's a state grab to be allowed in effect to perform genocide .Torture already is happening.If this case starts a precedent that allows genocide of slow starvation for the"weak"..among us sanctioned by the state who holds life or death in their impersonal sadistic hands I can say we are FUCKED people..

Cases like the right to life or death for vulnerable people and their distraught families are so messy for people like Barbra Bush to waste her beautiful mind contemplating.Alot of people sadly are like her.Alot of people get tugged by emotions. There are far reaching implications for a case like this.And some of those implications are CHILLING. If we Let the state handle issues like this what does it say about US?..As for these bullshit elitists in Washington and the bully right to lifers ,they won't care who dies really unless they lose money or they are the ones to be starved next..

Do you trust the Bush administration,the right wing courts ,the Neocons,PNAC and the rich,to care,to hold the lives of your loved ones with respect,in their,greedy, grubby,hypocrite,fascist, piggy,selfish,lying, ghoulish hands?

Yes The War protests are important and this case is a circus...

Frankly what is happening to America with these sociopaths in control THAT is the real never ending circus.The corrupt make issues a circus,others get ignored,none get solved..they lie and spin the people ..Until people go blind and let them have more power .It's sad to see how narrow focused we are,so distracted the sheeple be

Is it true we Can't have many issues discussed on the table on DU because CNN is incapable of it must we too ignore one thing at the expense of another when so many issues are equally important?