to anyone it wasn't clear to before that their newspaper represents "privileged people". See the publishers letter printed last week. She goes into great detail.
People should not expect their editorials (op-ed or otherwise) to represent multiple views. They know what their values are and they are sticking to them.
On the opposite page from the publisher's letter, they ran two editorials supporting our countries use of torture. (None opposing).
See downthread - Even Chris Heinz does not see an endorsement in the WSJ as good for a Democrat. I'm actually afraid he is wrong - that it is the "privileged people" that Democrats think they have to pander to....
(Just like what the heck is Roemer doing with Scaife support. :spank: )
OTOH - here is Chris Heinz trying to drum up support among us for Simon Rosenberg & emailing Will Pitt....:freak: Maybe Dean should compete by coming on here himself. :kick:
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
