You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Math, or When Is 4 Percent Really 32 Percent ? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-05 09:12 AM
Original message
Bush Math, or When Is 4 Percent Really 32 Percent ?
Advertisements [?]
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=970

<snip>
The Bush Administration is gearing up for their sale of “Social Security Reform,” and if the early leaked reports are any indication, it will not be a model of honesty and clarity. The earliest reported blurb is a brief and thoroughly muddled bit of numerical trickery. According to published reports, the Administration is suggesting the diversion of 4 percentage points of the 12.4 percent federal payroll tax to private savings accounts.

That makes it sound like only a trivial amount of money would go into the private accounts, and implies that the amount is so small that it won’t have much impact on payments to current retirees or the federal deficit. But that’s wrong; 4 percentage points of 12.4 percent is 32 percent. Therefore, 32 percent of the workers’ total contribution would be earmarked for private investment.

<snip>
Now, under the guise of “reform,” they are attempting to destroy the program. They ignore the purpose of its creation by suggesting that it is a retirement system, and say that it could make more money for beneficiaries by investing in public equities in the stock market. But again this ignores the very purpose of the system.

We shouldn’t be surprised that Bush and his Republican allies are willing to twist numbers and misstate history to get their way. We’ve seen them do it in the past, most notably with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Then dissenting voices were shouted down. Many people couldn’t believe their own government would be so blatant with misstatements and half truths. Bush got away with it, but the results have been terrible. We can’t afford to let him get away with it again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC