You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #88: Lenidog.......I like your use of "Wiser People".... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. Lenidog.......I like your use of "Wiser People"....
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 11:09 PM by FrenchieCat
You write: "Clark stood down with the Russian because wiser people told him to do so.

Now, you've decided that for the sake of your argument it's convenient that it is now the "Wiser People" (your words, not mine) that gave Clark the order.

What I am telling you, and let me phrase this in a way that even you can understand.....
is this:
If you want to think that Shelton or Cohen gave the order....so be it. From my understanding about military command and issues....they gave the 4 star General, Supreme Allied Commander (understand Supreme?)of NATO approval of the order only. They were not on the ground, and therefore would not know about the issues with the Russians unless HE briefed THEM...and HE would have given a list of his recommendations to the "Wiser People"...the only way that the "Wiser People" would allow Clark do order a stand down would be if Clark presented THEM with a plan. In fact there would have been a Plan A, B, C...and who knows how many others...each depending on the circumstances and the reaction to any action taken.

For you to underestimate the Clinton's foreign policy team....to insinuate that the "Wiser People" would approve of anything dealing with the Russian without a plan in hand is bizarre.

Now you want me to provide you with the details of a plan that was never used.

I find that an unreasonable request which lacks any good faith...and by the way, you just keep asking questions and doubting all of the answers...yet offer nothing yourself but skepticism.

Lastly, YES, I am a supporter of the General. Do you have a problem with that? Do I get arrested just about now?

Again, If you re-read my posts on the Russian incident, have amply demonstrated that I do include facts and reliable sources when I respond.

And you?
Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC