You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Why Zogby's New Method is Supposed Improvement [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why Zogby's New Method is Supposed Improvement
Zogby did telephone polling for years, and still does some, but John Zogby feels that telephone polls have an unacceptable bias in this election. The reason is that cell phone numbers are never used. They don't come in reliable area coded lists that polsters know what to do with. But most college students these days have ONLY cell phones, and no residence phones of their own. This demographic is known from University-based polls to be anti-Bush.

Of course, there's some other demographics that prefer cell phones exclusively. Have you met any Drug Dealers for Bush? As far as I can see, the only drug dealers likely to vote for Bush are the ones who really work for the CIA! Or at least have some kind of a buisness arrangement with the Bush family....

Zogby's internet method is supposed to send the interactive poll invitations in some statistically balanced method. It's not just a poll he puts up at some site, which would obviously be susceptible to a lot of partisan bias, and perhaps some technical manipulation as well. How do they KNOW each person only votes only once in those on-site polls? Anyone with access to a few computers and perhaps a little technical cleverness can find a way to enter multiple votes!

Zogby thinks he's found a way around these problems. I'd trust his results a bit more than most "lies, damn lies and statistics".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC