You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Amazingly similar. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. Amazingly similar.
There were many Dean fans, so although I was grateful for Dean's surrogate help (as one of the few at all), his fans were hold-your-nose-Dems who couldn't muster enthusiasm or resisted voting for Kerry. There were primary wars that never ended. Lots of infighting. Many first-timers new to the legislative process and what votes mean: yes, but or no, but-never perfect, who were endlessly critical.

People believed the media, or if they didn't, they complained, just like now.

They didn't understand the challenges of 2004, the opponents using fear, and that Bush and the war were popular. We were up more than a few points until the OBL tape the weekend before. So when McCain says he'll win it 48 hours before the election, I'm warning all that we can't take this for granted.

Whether an October surprise, bombing Iran, or election theft, we can't rest on our laurels here, and rag on Obama more than McCain.

The FISA issue reminds me of the IWR, when the vote was not a vote for war, allowing Bush to escape the real blame. All blamed Kerry. I don't think we'll lose our Constitution on FISA, and we can tinker later. But the emotions are the same-voted for war-voted for trashing our Constitution. Using emotional arguments and easy to quote phrases. I hate War. Save the Constitution. Easy to gather support and stoke emotion.

We also had a Bill problem, because of his lackluster support (on his summer book tour apologizing for the war and Bush's motives and not mentioning Kerry), probably holding the place for Hillary. He also suggested waiting on the swifties response, that Kerry should sign onto the marriage amendment (which Kerry didn't do, of course) and other dubious suggestions.

We liked Kerry's long, expressive hands, and found him nimble, cool, temperamentally suited, not rattled and able to side step the media when interviewed, and great with kids. Sounds familiar?

There was a media freeze of a presidential Kerry, and he had to go under the radar to local media. Media never showing the large crowds, the humor, just a Kerry head shot, and preferring to show long, staged events with Bush. Making excuses for him.

Yes, there was a lack of big picture on the blogs, and of seriously doing what was needed. Lack of Democratic support cost us. It was anybody but Bush, and we could have gotten more to the polls if Kerry's qualities were shared.

Kerry said Obama was his candidate of a lifetime, and I have to agree. Kerry connected better than was reported, but Obama is a phenom.

Maybe this isn't what you wanted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC