You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #50: I could not agree more [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Eyes_wide_ open Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
50. I could not agree more
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 12:34 AM by Eyes_wide_ open
"I think it is wrong for people at a Democratic forum to post thread after thread urging silence on things that matter."

and so very, very sad because if they are successful, they will have sealed their own fate ... never seeing that by using the tactics of the enemy, even if we win we will have gained nothing.

Doesn't anybody here remember that the madman in the White House used the very same rhetoric to rally a nation blinded by fear to silence the dissenters to a war that nobody but a few neocon and vengeful mob wanted?

Unity is a wonderful thing, and necessary if we are going to win. But we do not have to accept the shrubbery's definition of unity. Unity, to me, means working together towards a common goal. We don't have to agree on every little point of method and procedure. We do not need to be silent about what we think needs to be done to reach that goal. I do not accept the neocon mantra "if you aren't for us you are against us".

Some things Obama has done recently have caused me some concern as they have many here. If we can't talk about those concerns among ourselves, how in the hell do you think we're going to convince anyone not already on the team that they should join us?

Yes there has been some over the top bashing that needs to stop, it really is counter-productive. But you're never going to stop that with equally over the top rants of STFU and take it either, and it is just as counter-productive. How about we spend all this time we're wasting fighting with each other to do something that actually helps move us towards our goal?

Admin can take care of disrupters. Time spent arguing with them is just time lost. Labeling everyone that expresses a different view on any given subject than our candidate as a disrupter ... or disloyal ... or purist ... or progressive ... or whatever ... may win you a battle, but cost you the war. You really don't want to chase everyone away that doesn't agree 100% away do you? That's definitely a losing strategy.

In the words of MLK
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC