Reply #13: I realize this but often it is via such a small detail or a twisting of a

[Samantha]

word to create a sensationalized version of an ordinary statement.

In this case, it is so blatant because the principal is a Supreme Court Judge discussing what is often referred to as one of its worst opinions in its history in a matter religiously followed by millions of Americans. This is not a small detail or a twist of a word. This is a monumental mistake made by someone who obviously should not have made it on a subject of great importance, a judicial record of which is readily available.

In my book, it's a mistake so huge I cannot characterize it in mere words. I remain appalled. Judging by many of the responses here, one should not be surprised by anything Scalia does, but this is breathtaking - even for him.

Thank you for response.