Reply #155: Is "Influencing the Superdelegates" a banned activity?

[intaglio]

Because then the Sen Clinton campaign's to court, influence and harass superdelegates must also be banned. Perhaps the denigrating and slander against superdelegates who have chosen to support Obama should also be banned. The alternative is that you think Hillary has some sort of exclusive right to all superdelegates.

As for "mockeries of reason" this post seems to fit the bill far better than Nance Greggs' OP. Were MI and FL winner take all primaries? I do not think so. Interestingly Hillary ould barely gain 50% of the vote in both of those states, states where other candidates barely campaigned and in one of which she was the only major named candidate on the ballot. In addition are you in denial of Hillary's assertion that the MI vote, at least WOULD NOT COUNT? Sorry to shout but sometimes emphasis beyond bold is needed.

As for misrepresenting Hillary's positions ... are you saying the press is too dumb to go back and check sources? or that the Clinton campaign is too stupid to be able to anticipate such attacks - attacks of the sort which Hillary's campaign is so adroit at executing in the first place? Perhaps you believe that Hillary has some sort of divine right to misrepresent, slander, distract, lie and obfuscate?

As to taking money from corporations .... well I have seen more intricate cover-up stories than yours but only in the pages of Nexus or David Icke books.

MT when I first saw your post's I thought that you were a reasonable HRC supporter but now I class you with the other lunatics and frauds who seem to populate so much of her campaign