Reply #167: Arrogance and ignorance are a bad combination.

[budedis]

You know nothing of my abilities beyond the few hundred words that I posted. Don't try to put ideas into my mind or words into my mouth or into my posts. How do you conclude that the post was about Carlin's philosophical leanings? That I "claim his philosophy"? I was commenting on one aspect of MT's statements concerning misogyny. Clearly you missed it (ignorant) or chose to ignore it (arrogant).

I might say from your post that you are without a doubt a wisp of an intellect. But that would be a sweeping conclusion based upon a superficial and very brief encounter. That was the point of my post. Whenever you imply that you know the real intent and motivation for the actions and words of others you are always WRONG.

The subject line of this post is a good example (and is exactly why I chose those words). You are clearly of inferior intellectual abilities yet very sure of yourself nonetheless. Furthermore it is obvious that you haven't a clue as to what Carlin is really getting at when he makes a comment like "what the fuck is this shit". I don't really believe this but it is easy to draw such a conclusion about you based only on the words in your post.

Disagree with the ideas expressed by the words as you understand them. Tell us about MT's damn few logical fallacies or supply links to more supporting information or that you don't share my admiration for Clintons, Obamas, Edwardses and Kuciniches.