Reply #72: No, I think they are both weak. Obama's statement that he wasn't sure how he would have voted if he

[Benhurst]

had been in the U.S. Senate and his subsequent votes to fund the occupation undermine his earlier position before entering the U.S. Senate.

Beyond that, I think they both have unique vulnerabilities which will be brought in play by Rove and Company. And if the election is close, our corporate media is poised and ready to intone after our third stolen election that "when it came time to select the next president of the United States in the voting booth, America wasn't ready for an African American" or "wasn't ready for a woman," as the case may be.

And just why hasn't our leadership, including Clinton and Obama, done a damn thing to address the last two stolen elections?