You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #12: You're right
[View All]
phrigndumass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
And this is the case because over 80% of the pledged delegates have already been allocated. It's almost over with the state contests. ANY candidate in that position wouldn't be able to catch up.
The Clinton campaign's modus operandi is now "divide and conquer." Dividing the pledged delegates into caucus delegates and primary delegates is an example of this, as was dividing the states between big states and little states.
Dividing to conquer is so divisive!
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread