Reply #128: I can understand why Clinton goes for the jugular with the advisors

[peacetalksforall]

she has and their need for the DLC to control everything, but Obama doesn't have to stoop low. He is supposed to have the class, originality, and freshness to deal with a fight without hitting low which he is doing. She handled her opposition just finr in the 90's. What changed for them? What a disappointment.

How does one get enthusiastic over either? It's like Israeili leaders and their military with the Palestinians - an eye for an eye in perpetuity.

I am tired of people fighting who have a royal fight of an ungodly magnitude even if they worked together.

It's so real and so phony - because you can project ahead and see them with raised arms when one of them wins.

Where's Al Gore - he's a fighter also, but with more class than either Clinton or Obama at this point in time. I hope they haven't crossed their point in time.

One thing about both of them = they don't seem to talk about and haven't done much about vote theft. It doesn't exist for them, it semms. It's something the people can do for themselves. Criticize Diebold or Hagel/ES & S or the others? Not them.